The Bell Of The Green Bicycle That Never Stopped Ringing

The bicycle always arrived before the bell.

Even now, after half a century had coagulated into the sediment of old age, that was the first image that surfaced from the abyss whenever memory loosened its iron clasp. A gleaming green bicycle gliding through the mist laden mornings of a provincial schoolyard. Its mudguards flashed like polished emerald under the slanting sun. The handlebar shimmered. The bell carried a bright metallic resonance that seemed almost jubilant, entirely discordant with the temperament of the man who rode it.

Children noticed such things with uncommon precision. They forgot algebra and geography with astonishing speed, yet remembered the smell of chalk on wet fingers, the texture of cane on skin, the angle at which a teacher’s sandal scraped the floor. The bicycle became an emblem before the man himself did. It stood in the cycle shed like an object of ceremonial grandeur while the owner moved through corridors with the countenance of a vindictive ascetic.

He was the drawing teacher.

White shirt. White dhothi. Skeletal frame. Hollow cheeks. Thin lips perpetually compressed into disapproval. His eyes were narrow and cold, carrying an almost predatory attentiveness. There are faces upon which cruelty does not merely appear during anger but resides permanently like an inscription. His was such a face. Even silence around him felt punitive.

Children feared him instinctively.

Not the healthy fear reserved for discipline or sternness. This was a subterranean terror. The kind that made laughter collapse into whispers the instant his shadow crossed a veranda. The kind that transformed ordinary mistakes into calamities. He had cultivated it with patient expertise.

The school itself was old and porous. Rainwater seeped through cracked ceilings during monsoon. The classrooms smelled of chalk powder, damp notebooks, coconut oil, and the faint acidity of rusting iron windows. Crows perched upon the mango tree behind the assembly ground and shrieked incessantly during arithmetic periods. The playground became a field of ochre dust during summer and a swamp during rain.

Life moved with rustic slowness there.

Children came barefoot or in worn sandals. Lunch boxes carried rice wrapped in cloth. Ink stained fingers. Slates broke. Boys fought over marbles. Girls skipped rope beneath the tamarind tree. The world had not yet accelerated into machinery and screens. Humiliation, therefore, acquired permanence. There were no distractions powerful enough to dissolve it.

The boy was in fifth standard when it happened.

He had been neither rebellious nor exceptionally timid. Merely another child navigating the obscure cartography of school life. Thin shoulders. Curious eyes. Knees perpetually bruised from play. He loved drawing rivers and boats though he feared the drawing teacher intensely. Ironically, fear sharpened observation. He noticed the teacher’s bicycle every morning because the bicycle possessed something the man lacked entirely. Beauty!

The green paint fascinated him.

Sometimes sunlight pooled over it so luminously that the machine appeared unreal. The chrome bell especially captivated him. It sat upon the handlebar like a silver fruit. The boy often imagined the sound it would make up close. A crisp triumphant ringing. The voice of freedom itself.

Children are irresistibly drawn toward forbidden objects.

One afternoon the school day had nearly ended. Heat floated heavily across the compound. Cicadas screamed from distant trees. Most teachers remained inside the staff room drinking tea. The cycle stand was quiet except for the ticking sounds of cooling metal.

The boy wandered there with two classmates.

“Look at that bicycle,” whispered one.

“It shines like a cinema bicycle,” another murmured.

The boy approached slowly. The green frame gleamed with immaculate polish. Not a speck of mud stained the wheels. Even the spokes reflected light. He looked around nervously.

“No one is here,” said the smaller child.

“Do not touch it,” warned the other. “If he sees, we are dead.”

The boy extended a finger toward the bell.

Even decades later he remembered the sensation with agonizing clarity. The cool metal beneath skin. The infinitesimal hesitation. The intoxicating curiosity.

Then he pressed.

The bell rang.

A bright crystalline sound burst through the stillness.

One ring only.

Yet before its echo dissolved, another sound emerged. Sandals striking concrete with frightening velocity.

The teacher appeared as if materialized from wrath itself.

“What did you do?”

The voice cracked like a whip.

The other boys fled instantly. Terror endowed them with animal speed. The boy remained frozen beside the bicycle, his hand still suspended in guilt.

The teacher advanced.

“You touched my bicycle?”

The boy stammered. “I only rang the bell, sir.”

The next moment became eternal.

The teacher seized the boy’s ear between sharp fingers and twisted violently. Pain exploded through the side of his head. Not ordinary pain but something incandescent, humiliating, annihilating. The teacher twisted harder and dragged him away from the cycle stand.

“You filthy brat,” he hissed. “Who gave you permission?”

The boy cried out.

Several children turned toward the commotion. A peon watched from a distance. No one intervened.

“You think this is a toy?” the teacher shouted.

His fingers dug deeper into the ear. The boy felt as though flesh were tearing away from the skull itself.

“Please, sir,” the boy gasped. “I am sorry.”

But apology only intensified the cruelty.

The teacher struck the back of the boy’s head with his knuckles and twisted the ear again. Tears flooded uncontrollably. The world blurred into sunlight and agony.

“Animals,” the teacher spat. “Savages without manners.”

Then came the ultimate desecration.

He dragged the child across the courtyard while holding the ear, forcing him to stumble publicly before students from multiple classes. Laughter erupted from some corners. Others watched with frightened silence. Humiliation seeped deeper than pain. It entered the bloodstream.

The teacher finally released him near the veranda.

The boy collapsed to one knee clutching his burning ear.

“Next time,” the teacher said coldly, “I will break your fingers.”

Then he walked away.

White shirt immaculate. Dhothi fluttering. Face devoid of remorse.

The boy remained there trembling.

One teacher passing nearby glanced briefly at him but continued walking. Such incidents were common then. Corporal punishment possessed institutional sanctity. Adults considered childhood emotions inconsequential. Pain educated. Humiliation civilized. Fear disciplined.

No one asked whether the punishment corresponded to the act.

The boy returned home that evening with swollen skin and a silence that alarmed his mother.

“What happened to your ear?”

“Nothing.”

“Did someone hit you?”

“No.”

But mothers excavate truth from silence.

After repeated questioning the story emerged haltingly. The mother grew furious immediately.

“For ringing a bell?”

The father listened while washing his feet near the well. His expression remained unreadable.

“He should not have touched the bicycle,” he said finally.

The mother stared in disbelief. “He is a child.”

“Teachers have authority.”

Authority.

The word entered the boy’s consciousness that evening like poison entering groundwater. Authority could twist flesh. Authority could humiliate publicly. Authority could transform trivial curiosity into criminality. Most horrifyingly, authority rarely apologized.

The ear healed within days.

The hatred did not.

Years passed but the drawing teacher remained unchanged. He moved through school like an emissary of bitterness. He slapped children for smudged lines. He ridiculed handwriting. He mocked poverty.

“Your drawing looks like vomit,” he once told a child before the entire class.

Another day he struck a boy with a ruler because the watercolour spilled accidentally.

He cultivated fear deliberately. One could see satisfaction flickering across his face whenever students recoiled.

The boy avoided him obsessively thereafter. Yet avoidance became impossible because trauma magnetizes attention. He watched the teacher constantly. The cruel face. The immaculate bicycle. The white shirt glowing beneath sun. Every detail etched itself into memory with pathological precision.

Sometimes during drawing period the teacher wandered between desks like a prison guard.

“What is this?” he would sneer.

“A tree, sir.”

“A tree? Even blind men can draw better.”

Children laughed nervously to protect themselves from becoming the next target.

The boy learned something profound during those years. Cruel people rarely perceive themselves as cruel. The drawing teacher believed himself refined, disciplined, superior. He admired order. He worshipped control. He interpreted fear as respect.

One monsoon afternoon the boy saw him cleaning the green bicycle beneath the veranda while rain hammered the courtyard. The teacher polished the chrome lovingly with a cloth. His face softened momentarily with almost paternal affection.

The sight disturbed the boy deeply.

So the man possessed tenderness after all. He simply reserved it for objects.

The bicycle remained immaculate throughout the years. Children speculated that the teacher loved it more than human beings. Perhaps he did.

Time moved onward.

The boy entered higher classes. New teachers arrived. Old students departed. Adolescence complicated existence with examinations, bodily transformations, ambitions, insecurities. Yet the memory endured with curious vividness. Some humiliations dissolve because later experiences eclipse them. Others fossilize.

This one fossilized.

Whenever the bell of a bicycle rang anywhere, something tightened inside him involuntarily.

He never touched another person’s bicycle without permission again. Not from politeness but from fear.

During college years he occasionally narrated the incident humorously among friends. They laughed.

“For ringing a bell?”

“What a mad fellow.”

He laughed too, outwardly. But beneath the laughter lived a smoldering residue. Memory behaves differently within the injured. Outsiders perceive anecdotes. The wounded preserve atmospheres.

He remembered not merely pain but the sun that day. The dust. The smell of grease from the cycle stand. The feeling of public diminishment. The awareness that adults nearby considered it acceptable.

Years accumulated.

Employment came. Marriage followed. Children arrived. Parents aged and died. Hair silvered gradually. Life layered itself with responsibilities, griefs, and triumphs substantial enough to eclipse childhood.

Yet strangely, the drawing teacher remained alive inside memory with monstrous freshness.

Sometimes during sleepless nights the old scene replayed itself involuntarily. The green bicycle standing in the shed. The metallic ring. The sudden eruption of fury.

Why did certain injuries refuse burial?

He pondered this often during late adulthood.

Perhaps because childhood humiliations occur before one develops protective cynicism. They enter consciousness unfiltered. The child still believes adults are custodians of justice. When an adult behaves monstrously without consequence, the universe itself appears contaminated.

One evening in his sixties he attended a school reunion.

The campus had changed considerably. New buildings rose where fields once existed. The old cycle stand remained barely recognizable beneath layers of renovation. Plastic chairs occupied the assembly hall. Ceiling fans rotated lazily above balding men reminiscing about vanished youth.

Laughter flowed abundantly.

“Do you remember the mathematics teacher?”

“And the headmaster who snored during assembly?”

Memory transformed many former fears into comedy.

Then someone mentioned the drawing teacher.

Silence followed unexpectedly.

“He was vicious,” one man muttered.

Another touched his cheek unconsciously. “He slapped me so hard once that I bled from the mouth.”

“He hated children.”

“He pinched ears like a demon.”

The old anger stirred inside the boy who was no longer a boy.

“What happened to him?” someone asked.

“He died years ago,” came the reply.

No one expressed sorrow.

The conversation drifted elsewhere but the old man remained silent. Death should have neutralized hatred. Society insists upon this moral arithmetic. Yet he discovered with discomfort that the resentment still pulsed within him almost intact.

Why?

Because death erases future possibilities, not past realities.

The drawing teacher had never apologized. Never acknowledged disproportionate cruelty. Never recognized the humanity of frightened children.

A strange melancholy enveloped the old man during the reunion. He walked alone afterward through the twilight corridors. Classrooms stood empty. Dust floated through amber light. Distant traffic murmured beyond compound walls.

He reached the approximate location of the former cycle stand.

For several minutes he stood there motionless.

The place looked smaller now.

Childhood enlarges geography through emotion. What once resembled a grand mechanical sanctuary now appeared merely a narrow concrete strip beside a wall.

Yet memory reconstructed everything vividly. The green bicycle. The chrome bell. The teacher’s face convulsed with rage.

An extraordinary realization descended then.

He had carried the teacher inside himself for more than fifty years.

Not the actual man. The man had decomposed into earth long ago. What survived was an interior tyrant created by humiliation. Each recollection renewed him.

The old man sat upon a low parapet wall.

Evening deepened gradually. Bats emerged from trees. Somewhere nearby children laughed during a game. Their voices floated across the compound like echoes from another universe.

He wondered whether the drawing teacher himself had once been brutalized similarly during childhood. Cruelty often descends genealogically. Injured children mature into punitive adults who reproduce the violence they endured. Perhaps another teacher once twisted his ear publicly. Perhaps poverty embittered him. Perhaps loneliness corroded him.

But speculation did not absolve.

Suffering explains cruelty more often than evil does. Yet explanation cannot resurrect dignity once destroyed.

The old man remembered another incident suddenly.

A rainy day during sixth class. One child had forgotten drawing paper. The teacher forced him to stand outside in rain for nearly an hour.

“Maybe water will wash stupidity from your brain,” he said.

The child developed fever afterward.

How casually adults damaged children then.

The old man sighed heavily.

A younger alumnus approached him. “Sir, everyone is taking photographs.”

“In a moment.”

“You seem thoughtful.”

“Only remembering.”

The younger man smiled politely and departed.

Remembering.

That was the burden. Memory preserved moral asymmetry. The teacher probably forgot the incident within hours. For him it was routine exertion of authority. For the child it became permanent psychic sediment.

Such disparities define human cruelty. The wounder forgets. The wounded remember.

Darkness thickened around the schoolyard.

The old man rose slowly and walked toward the gate. Near the entrance an old bicycle leaned against a wall. Not green. Rusted and ordinary. Yet the sight arrested him unexpectedly.

He approached.

The bell hung slightly crooked upon the handlebar.

An absurd impulse surfaced. Childish. Trembling. Profound.

He looked around.

No one watched.

Very gently he pressed the bell.

It rang softly into the evening.

Nothing happened.

No furious footsteps erupted. No hand seized his ear. No public humiliation descended. Only the delicate fading resonance of metal dissolving into dusk.

Unexpected tears filled his eyes.

The reaction startled him. He stood beside the bicycle overwhelmed by emotion too ancient for easy articulation. Perhaps he was grieving not the pain itself but the frightened child who had endured it silently for decades.

A voice emerged behind him.

“Nice sound, isn’t it?”

An elderly watchman smiled while locking the gate.

“Yes,” the old man whispered. “Very nice.”

He walked home afterward through streets glowing beneath sodium lamps. The night air carried scents of rain and fried food from roadside stalls. Motorcycles roared past. Young people laughed beside tea shops. Life continued with magnificent indifference.

Yet internally something subtle had shifted.

Not forgiveness. He could not romanticize cruelty merely because time had elapsed. Certain actions deserve enduring condemnation. But the memory no longer possessed identical authority over him. Ringing the bell had not resurrected terror. Instead it exposed the absurd disproportion between the act and punishment.

A child had merely been curious.

Nothing more.

At home his grandson sat drawing upon the floor.

“What are you making?” the old man asked.

“A bicycle.”

The child held up the paper proudly. Bright green crayons formed the frame.

For one fleeting second the old dread returned.

Then it vanished.

“Beautiful,” he said softly.

The child smiled. “It needs a bell.”

“Yes,” the old man replied after a pause. “Every bicycle deserves a bell.”

The grandson drew a silver circle near the handlebar.

“Can I ring your bicycle bell tomorrow?” the child asked suddenly.

The question pierced through decades.

The old man knelt slowly despite aching knees. He placed a gentle hand upon the child’s shoulder.

“You never need permission to ring a bell,” he said.

The child laughed delightedly and resumed drawing.

That night the old man slept unusually well.

Dreams arrived but lacked terror. He wandered through the old schoolyard beneath radiant morning light. Mango leaves shimmered. Children ran laughing across the courtyard. The green bicycle stood beside the cycle shed immaculate as ever.

Yet the drawing teacher was absent.

Only the bicycle remained.

The old man approached it calmly. Sunlight reflected from chrome. He touched the bell lightly.

Its sound spread outward pure and resonant, no longer carrying humiliation or fear but something almost elegiac.

Then even the bicycle dissolved into brightness.

When dawn arrived he sat beside the window listening to real bicycles passing upon the road outside. Bells rang intermittently through the waking town. Vendors shouted. Birds stirred within coconut trees.

Ordinary sounds.

He realized then that hatred survives by ritual repetition. Each recollection had sharpened the drawing teacher anew inside memory. But memory can also be reconfigured. Not erased. Never erased. Only repositioned within the architecture of consciousness.

The cruelty remained condemnable.

The child remained innocent.

The teacher remained morally impoverished despite polished bicycle and immaculate clothing.

Yet the old man himself no longer needed to remain imprisoned beside that cycle stand forever.

Morning sunlight entered the room gradually.

He closed his eyes and saw once more the frightened fifth class boy standing beside the gleaming green bicycle with a hand hovering toward forbidden wonder. Such tenderness surged toward that child now. Such sorrow.

Children reach toward beauty instinctively.

Cruel adults punish them for it.

That was the entire tragedy.

PS: Do we need to give a name to this cruel guy in this fictionary tale set half a century ago in central Travancore? Let it be Pthrambaran or Srdhguran or Janurduwnan.

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊

The Fall of Hubris: Karma’s Silent Justice

In the gleaming tower that loomed over the city skyline, the office of the company’s CEO was a monument to opulence. Polished marble floors reflected the soft glow of chandeliers, and glass walls offered a panoramic view of the bustling streets below. At the center of it all sat an elderly woman, her hair perfectly coiffed, her makeup impeccably applied. But despite her age, she carried herself with a flair that belied her years. She was determined to appear youthful, trendy, even rebellious. She wore designer clothes that accentuated her figure, chunky jewelry, and a pair of bright red lipstick that she applied with a flourish every morning. Little did she know she projected herself as a rotten crumbled rag to others around her!

Today, she was in a particularly mischievous mood. She had summoned an employee, a young man new to the company, who looked visibly anxious as he stepped into her office. His face was pale, and he kept fidgeting with his hands, clutching a small stack of papers - his leave request form.

“Ah, come in, come in,” she greeted him, voice high-pitched and playful. “Don’t be shy. I like to keep things lively around here. Sit down. Or do you prefer to stand? I can see you’re nervous. Relax. It’s just me, the young and fabulous CEO!”

He managed a weak smile, trying to hide his discomfort. “Thank you, ma’am. I just wanted to discuss my leave request.”

She leaned forward, resting her elbows on her desk, her bright eyes twinkling with mischief. “Your leave request, hmm? Let me see.” She snatched the papers from his hands and pretended to read them carefully. “You want time off because… your children are sick?” she repeated, voice dripping with exaggerated concern. “Oh, how adorable! Little ones falling ill. That’s so touching. You are such a brave parent, you are.”

He shifted uncomfortably. “Yes, it’s urgent. I need to be with them. Their health is not good.”

“Oh, how touching,” she said again, mockingly. “You must be a very caring parent. Or maybe just a very caring employee. Or perhaps you’re trying to pull the wool over my eyes. Kids get sick all the time. It’s part of life, you know?”

The young man looked down, cheeks flushed. “It’s not just a cold. It’s serious. I need to be there.”

She chuckled softly, a tinkling sound that seemed almost fake. “Serious, you say? Or are you just looking for a little break? A vacation from the office hustle? Come on now. Do you really think I believe that your children are the only sick ones in the city?”

He hesitated, then spoke quietly. “It’s true. They need me. I can’t just leave them alone.”

She leaned back in her chair, crossing her arms, the smile never leaving her face. “You, you, you. Always so dramatic. I like that. But let me ask you - what about your responsibilities here? Do your children’s sickness excuse your absence from work? Do they?”

He swallowed hard. “I’ve been working very hard. I just… I need this time.”

“Oh, I’m sure you do,” she said, voice playful but sharp. “But tell me, do your children know you’re risking your job for them? Or do you think your boss is just a big softie who’ll let you go free?”

He looked away, embarrassment flooding him. “I didn’t mean to cause trouble. I just… I want to do the right thing.”

She leaned forward again, her eyes narrowing. “The right thing? Hmm. Let me tell you something. There is no ‘right thing’ in this company. There is only what gets you ahead, what keeps you employed, what makes you look good. And right now, you’re looking quite bad. Are you sure you’re not trying to dodge something else?”

He opened his mouth to respond, but she cut him off before he could speak. “Or maybe you’re just a terrible planner. You should have thought about this beforehand. Kids get sick all the time. Life is unpredictable. That’s what makes it interesting, right?”

He felt a surge of frustration, but kept his voice steady. “Please, I’m asking sincerely. I need to be with them. It’s important.”

She clapped her hands softly, mockingly. “Oh, how sweet. Very noble of you. But tell me, do you think that kind of attitude will get you anywhere in life? Do you think I started this empire by caring about sick children? No, no, I built it by being tough, by making sure everyone did their job, come rain or shine.”

He looked down, feeling smaller by the moment. “I understand. But I can’t just abandon them.”

She stood up suddenly, stretching her arms and puffing out her chest as if she were a young girl playing dress-up. “Abandon? Oh, my dear boy, you’re making it sound like you’re off to war. It’s just a few days. Maybe a week. Kids get better. Life goes on. Or do you want to be the hero who loses his job because he couldn’t prioritize right?”

He hesitated, then managed to speak. “I have no choice. My wife is at work. I have to be there for them.”

She rolled her eyes dramatically, then looked at him with mock surprise. “Your wife is working? Well, that’s just perfect. So you’re the main caregiver now? How modern of you. Maybe you should write a book about balancing work and children. Or better yet, start a blog. ‘The Struggles of the Modern Father’ - I’d read that.”

He clenched his jaw but said nothing. She was relentless, acting as though she was young and rebellious. It was a nauseating sight, this all bony creature shouting!

“Listen,” she continued, voice lowering slightly, “I’ve seen many employees come and go. Some cry, some plead. But only the strong survive. And the weak? They get shown the door. You want to be one of the strong ones? Then stop whining about your sick kids and get back to work. Of course I value virtue above all else, for it is the foundation of true greatness, and I would never stoop to anything less."

What a heroic speech, this deceitful lady stoops lower than a thief!

He looked at her, a mixture of frustration and helplessness. “I’m not trying to avoid work. I just… I need a little understanding.”

“Oh, understanding,” she mocked. “You want understanding? Well, let me tell you something about understanding. It’s something you earn, not something you demand. I’ve been around a long time, and let me tell you, compassion is earned through hard work, not through excuses.”

He took a deep breath, finally gathering his courage. “I am committed to my work. But right now, my children need me. That’s why I came here. I’m asking for a little compassion. Just a few days.”

She leaned forward again, her eyes twinkling with mischief. “Compassion? Ha! You want compassion? Well, here’s my compassion - get back to work or find another job. Life doesn’t stop because your children are sick. It keeps moving. And so should you.”

He stood, voice trembling. “I’m sorry if I caused any trouble. I just hoped... "

She interrupted, raising a hand. “Hoped? No, no. Hope is for fairy tales. This is reality. And in reality, you do what you’re told. Now, I suggest you go back and tell your wife she should have planned better. Or maybe she should work fewer hours. Or maybe you should find a different line of work or wife!One where you don’t have to choose between your children and your paycheck.”

In reality this lady was paying him peanuts. Poorest pay! She was exploiting him. But her attitude was like she was paying him a huge sum! Cunning deceitful lady!

Suddenly, her son, the manager, walked in and overheard the conversation. Smirking, he added, "Looks like someone’s trying to escape work again, huh?" Together, they shared a sneer, mocking the employee’s desperation.He quickly understood the situation and was able to join all dots. Mother-son duo combo was plotting for his exit for a long time! This is just a drama to expel him forever! And before doing it, insult to the maximum possible. It was all crystal clear.

He began to lose patience hearing all these insults coming out of the dirty mouth of this filthy lady and her equally bad son. He looked at her determined. “I will find a way.”

She smiled, a bright and mocking grin. “That’s what they all say. But remember this - if you ever want to keep this job, you’ll stop coming here with silly excuses and start showing some backbone. Now, get out of my office.”

He nodded silently and turned to leave. As he reached the door, she called after him, still smiling with that youthful, rebellious attitude she tried so hard to emulate! Nauseating creature!

“Good luck. You’re going to need it. And remember - family first. Or not. Whatever suits your fancy.”

He tried to speak, but she cut him off with a wave of her hand. But he was determined to make her and her cantankerous son listen to his words. “No excuses. Just remember, karma has a funny way of catching up with people. You might think you’re clever now, but trust me, the universe has a way of balancing the scales. One day, you’ll suffer just like I am suffering now.”

He closed the door behind him, his heart heavy but his mind resolute. He knew he couldn’t let her mockery break him. He had a family to care for, and no matter what she said or did, he would find a way to be there for his children. Because at the end of the day, that was what mattered most.

Time passed, and the old lady’s health waned. Her children, whom she thought will look after her showed their true colors, promptly abandoning her, seeking their own lives and pleasures. Her manager son became a philanderer who began to spiral down in life drinking and was thrown out into the streets by the family. Her once powerful empire crumbled as she faced the consequences of her cruelty and vanity. She suffered in her final months, isolated and broken, realizing too late that her arrogance had set her on a path of destruction. All those in the company who played directly and indirectly to expel the employee mocking him also met with more or less similar fate. 

Karma, she learned, was relentless. The very pain she had inflicted on others had returned tenfold. As she took her last breath, she was consumed by regret and despair, her soul descending into the depths of hell, where Satan himself awaited her, a fitting end to a life of vanity and cruelty. The universe’s justice had finally caught up, teaching her a bitter lesson she would carry into eternity: no one escapes karma forever.

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊

Academic Bullying: an Account of Ivory Tower Toxicity

The first thing new students noticed was not the footsteps.

Conversations would dissolve mid sentence, laughter would shrink into tight smiles, and eyes would suddenly find the floor. It was not respect. It was something heavier, something that sat in the chest and made breathing feel like a task.

On the first day, many dismissed it as discipline. 

After all, every institution needed order. Every system needed structure. But slowly, quietly, almost invisibly, that idea began to change shape.

In one of the classrooms, a student stood beside a desk, hands trembling slightly. The rest of the class avoided looking directly at the scene unfolding.

“Answer the question,” came the voice from the front.

“I tried, but I am not sure if I understood it fully,” the student replied, voice barely steady.

“Not sure?” the voice echoed, rising just enough to draw attention. “You come here, you take a seat meant for someone capable, and you say you are not sure?”

A faint murmur passed through the room, quickly suppressed.

“Look at your classmates,” the voice continued. “Do you think they came here to watch you fail?”

No one spoke. No one moved.

“Maybe failing suits you,” the voice added. “It certainly suits your effort.”

The student nodded, not because there was agreement, but because disagreement had consequences. That was something everyone learned early.

What began as correction slowly became humiliation. What began as authority turned into control.

Assignments were not just tasks. They were instruments. A missed detail could invite a remark that lingered long after the class ended. A slight hesitation could become a label that followed a student across semesters.

“I will remember this,” the voice would say sometimes, almost casually.

Those words carried weight. 

They meant internal marks could shift. 

They meant evaluations could turn unpredictable. 

They meant that performance alone was not enough.

In corridors, students spoke in fragments.

“Did you submit?”

“Yes.”

“Was it enough?”

“I do not know.”

That uncertainty was not accidental. It was cultivated.

One afternoon, a group gathered near the back staircase, away from watchful eyes.

“This is not right,” one of them whispered. “We cannot keep living like this.”

“Lower your voice,” another replied quickly. “If someone hears…”

“So what if they hear?” the first insisted. “We are not doing anything wrong.”

“That is not how it works here,” came the response. “Right or wrong does not matter.”

There was a pause. A heavy one.

“Then what matters?”

“Who is watching.”

The system had its own language, unspoken but understood.

There were those who adapted. 

They learned quickly. They stayed silent when needed, spoke when it was safe, and agreed even when they disagreed. 

They survived.

Then there were those who questioned. Not loudly, not recklessly, but enough to be noticed.

Those were the ones who struggled.

Some of them were sent for counseling.

“I think you are overreacting,” the counselor would begin, voice calm, and practiced. “You need to understand that environments can be challenging.”

The student sat quietly, hands clasped.

“You need to focus on your response,” the counselor continued. “You need to adapt. You need to regulate your emotions. You need to build resilience.”

The repetition of you.... you....you...filled the room.

“But what about what is happening?” the student asked. 

“It is not just me.”

“You need to control what you can control,” came the reply. 

“You need to change how you interpret these situations. You need to avoid taking things personally.”

There was a pause.

“So it is my fault?” the student asked, almost whispering.

“It is not about fault,” the counselor said quickly. “It is about growth. You need to grow through this.”

The words sounded structured, almost rehearsed.

“You need to stop expecting fairness from everyone. You need to focus on your goals. You need to not let external factors affect you.”

The counselor concluded the session with a prolonged yawn eyeing the appointment list searching for the next client while accepting the exorbitant fees handed over by the exhausted and miserable parents. 

Parents had a fact finding session with the counselor before their college kid's session. They thought they would get compassionate guidance from the counselor but it was bracing for judgment.

Within minutes, the conversation turned toward what they had “missed” as parents.

Every concern they raised about was gently redirected back as their responsibility.

They exchanged uneasy glances, sensing the familiar undertone of blame dressed as insight.

By the time their session ended they became burdened by quiet guilt.

Outside the room, nothing changed.

Inside the room, everything was redirected.

In another classroom, a presentation was underway. Slides flickered on the screen as a student explained their work, voice steady despite the tension in the air.

Halfway through, the interruption came.

“Stop.”

The word cut through everything.

“Is this what you call effort?”

The student hesitated. “I followed the guidelines…”

“Guidelines?” the voice repeated with a faint laugh. “Do not hide behind words.”

A few students shifted in their seats. Their heart beats sounded like thunder. Hands became ice cold even though it was summer. Some were sweating like waterfalls. A few wanted to pay a visit to the loo!

“You think this is acceptable?”

Silence.

“Answer me.”

“I did my best,” the student said quietly.

“That is the problem,” came the reply. “Your best is not enough.”

The presentation ended before it truly began. 

The student returned to their seat, carrying more than just criticism.

Later, whispers spread.

“They did well.”

“Yes.”

“Then why…”

“You know why.”

Everyone knew. No one said it aloud.

There were other patterns too, quieter but just as visible.

Some students never seemed to face the same scrutiny.

Assignments submitted late were accepted without comment. Mistakes that would have drawn sharp criticism in others were brushed aside with a passing remark.

“Next time, be careful,” the voice would say gently to them.

The tone was different. Softer.

“Why is it like this?” someone whispered once.

“You know who they are,” came the reply.

Everyone did.

Backgrounds mattered. Influence mattered. Wealth mattered.

“Do not get involved with them,” one student advised another. “You will only get hurt.”

“They do not even try,” came a frustrated response. “And still…”

“And still they pass,” the first finished quietly.

In practical sessions, the difference became even more obvious.

“You can go,” one was told after a brief glance at incomplete work.

“Redo everything,” another was told, even after hours of effort.

No explanation was offered. None was needed.

Fairness had conditions.

Beyond the classrooms, another layer existed. Offices where decisions were made, where complaints could be raised, where fairness was supposed to live.

But those spaces had their own priorities.

“How many admissions this year?” one voice would ask.

“More than last year.”

“That is good. We must maintain that.”

“What about the concerns raised?”

A pause.

“Handle them internally.”

“Some of them are serious.”

“All concerns are serious,” the reply came smoothly. “But reputation is more serious.”

Profit spoke louder than principle. Numbers carried more weight than narratives.

Fees had been paid. Seats had been secured. The transaction created a different kind of silence. All patrons, protectors and guardians of the Institution have been made happy with their share of profit. The fortress is secured! Some sent their children here for studies, of course, free seats! They knew they will be treated well here! 

At home, conversations carried a different tone.

“We know it is hard,” a parent would say, voice heavy. “But you need to adjust.”

“I am trying,” the student replied. “It is not just difficult. It is unfair.”

“We understand,” came the response, softer now. “But you need to complete this. You need to focus on finishing.”

“They are targeting me,” the student said. “It is not normal.”

There was a long pause.

“You need to stay calm,” the parent continued. “You need to avoid conflicts. You need to not attract attention. You need to just get through this.”

The same pattern echoed again.

“But why should I accept this?” the student asked.

“Because walking away is not an option,” came the reply, almost breaking. “We have already invested so much. You need to be strong. You need to tolerate for now.”

The words were steady. The silence behind them was not.

“You need to think about your future. You need to not take risks. You need to finish what you started.”

“I feel like I am losing myself,” the student admitted.

“You will find yourself again,” the parent said, though the certainty was forced. “Just finish this first.”

They knew. They understood. But they were bound too.

They had seen similar systems. 

They had survived them in their own time.

“You need to adjust,” they repeated, even as it hurt to say it.

This was followed by fortuneteller visits and regular attendance by them to places of worship. Considerable money was spent for remedial rituals and charity hoping for divine intervention and blessings.

Not everyone participated in the system. There were those who saw what was happening, who felt the discomfort, who understood the damage.

“Why do you not say something?” a student once asked quietly after class.

The response came after a long silence.

“Sometimes speaking does not change things,” the voice said. 

“It only changes who suffers.”

That was the tragedy. 

Awareness without action. 

Concern without intervention.

Silence became a shield. 

And also a weapon.

Among students, divisions began to form. At first, they were subtle. Small groups that aligned themselves with authority. Students who received small favors, extra attention, a slightly easier path.

“They help us,” one of them would say. “Why should we go against them?”

“They help you,” someone corrected.

The distinction mattered.

These groups grew stronger over time. They became intermediaries. 

Messengers. Observers. Spies.

“If you have a problem,” they would say, “you should think carefully before raising it.”

“Why?”

“For your own good.”

Concern often masked control.

In one instance, a student tried to file a formal complaint.

“This cannot continue,” they said, standing outside an office.

“Are you sure?” a classmate asked. “Think about what will happen next.”

“I am already dealing with enough,” came the reply. “This is not living.”

The complaint was submitted.

The response was swift, though not official.

In class, the student was called out more often. Their work was scrutinized more harshly. Small mistakes were magnified.

“I expected better from you,” the voice would say, though expectations had never been clearly defined.

Peers began to distance themselves.

“I cannot be seen with you,” one admitted. “I am sorry.”

“Why?” the student asked.

“I have to think about my future.”

Isolation did what direct punishment could not. It weakened resolve. It created doubt. 

The student was sent again for counseling.

“You need to stop focusing on others,” the counselor said. 

“You need to focus on yourself. You need to detach from negativity. You need to develop coping strategies.”

The same rhythm returned.

“You need to understand that systems are not perfect. You need to work within them. You need to adjust your expectations.”

“But the system is hurting people,” the student said.

“You need to protect your mental space,” came the reply. 

“You need to avoid getting involved in conflicts.”

This time the consultation fees skyrocketed but the session lasted hardly thirty minutes.

As usual, outside the room nothing changed. Inside the room everything was redirected.

At home, the echo continued.

“You need to listen to them,” the parent said. “You need to not escalate things. You need to keep a low profile.”

“What if keeping a low profile means staying silent?” the student asked.

“Then stay silent for now,” came the painful answer. “You need to get through this.”

“What if it gets worse?”

“It will end,” the parent said, though uncertainty lingered. “Just hold on.”

"This too shall pass."

The conversation ended where it always did. With endurance replacing resolution.

Their astrologer visits became frequent and remedial rituals became expensive. The places of worship included other faiths as well. Stess induced illnesses attacked them severely. Doctor visits also became a routine and medical bills began accumulating. Loans increased.

“Maybe I was wrong,” the student wondered aloud one evening.

“No,” another said quietly. “You were just alone.”

That loneliness was by design.

There were also those who saw opportunity in this environment. 

Students who learned not just the subjects, but the system.

“You have to be smart,” one of them explained to a friend. “It is not about fighting. It is about aligning.”

“Aligning with what?”

“With power.”

They observed, adapted, and eventually mirrored the behaviors they once witnessed.

“If you want to succeed,” they would say later, “you cannot afford to be emotional.”

Empathy became a liability. 

Distance became a strategy.

Some of them too visited counselors, but with different questions.

“How do I stay ahead?” one asked.

“You need to stay focused,” came the response. “You need to not get distracted by unnecessary issues. You need to maintain your priorities.”

The alignment was subtle, but present.

In group discussions, their voices carried confidence.

“You are overthinking,” they would tell others. “This is how things work.”

Normalization was the final step. 

Once something is accepted as normal, it stops being questioned.

Time moved forward. 

Batches graduated. 

New students arrived.

The cycle continued.

Those who had adapted moved into workplaces, carrying with them the lessons they had learned.

In office settings, the patterns reappeared.

“Why did you not finish this?” a manager asked.

“I needed more time,” came the response.

“Time is not something we give,” the manager replied. “It is something you earn.”

The tone felt familiar. 

The system or those who manage the system wanted robots or robot like humans.

Work more and more, give us more profit, be satisfied with the peanuts we give you and stay mute until we throw you in the waste bin. Then only you will become very well adapted and aligned with the societal norms of success.  

Welcome to modern slavery🙏

In meetings, subtle exclusions took place. In discussions, voices were dismissed.

“Do not make this complicated,” someone would say.

“It is already complicated,” another thought, but did not speak.

Behind closed doors, conversations unfolded.

“You have to stay in the right group,” one colleague advised. “Otherwise, you will struggle.”

“What is the right group?”

“You will know.”

And they did.

It was the group that held influence. The group that shaped outcomes.

Old habits found new spaces. 

Gossip replaced open dialogue. 

Alliances replaced trust.

“You cannot trust everyone,” became a common phrase.

Sometimes it was true. Often it was a reflection of learned behavior.

There were moments of recognition. Times when someone paused and saw the pattern clearly.

“This feels wrong,” they would think.

But the response followed quickly.

“This is how things are.”

Acceptance came easier than resistance.

Not everyone adjusted. Some found the environment unbearable.

“I cannot do this,” one person said during a late night conversation with a friend.

“Then what will you do?”

“I do not know.”

Walking away felt like  failure. 

Staying felt like a compromise.

That internal conflict took a toll.

Some of them were advised again to seek counseling, even years later.

“You need to let go of the past,” the counselor would say. “You need to move on. You need to reframe your experiences. You need to build a positive outlook.”

"You must learn to manage your stress. There are countless people in this world having none of the comforts that you have. Think about them!"

The familiar pattern returned, unchanged by time.

It is.... 

You... You... You...! 👆👆👆👆

You are absolutely responsible for your worries! Accept this and move forward. Don't blame others or your environment.

“But those experiences shaped me,” the person said. “They are still affecting how I think.”

“You need to focus on what you can change now,” came the reply. “You need to not dwell on what cannot be changed.”

This time too the fee was exorbitant. Yawning was frequent indicating more boredom. This time instead of parents, the partner, who was present, had a fact-finding session with the counselor before the actual consultation. 

Partner and counselor had thoughts and behavior with the same wavelength. They unanimously agreed that one must be 'practical' and 'align with power and authority' aiming for 'survival'. Did they wonder or have had a discussion how the partner became involved with this impractical person? Possible! 

Can't blame them, though!

As usual, nothing changed outside the room. Inside the room everything was redirected! 

At home, even years later, the tone remained gentle but firm.

“You need to move forward,” the old parent would say. “You need to not carry this forever. You need to build your life now.”

“And what about what happened?” came the question.

A pause.

“You need to leave it behind,” the parent said quietly. “Some things cannot be fixed.”

"This is what I had been telling all the time. I am fed up with repeating this. We(You) have to be practical to be productive. Otherwise (y)our market value will diminish." Partner chimed in, frustrated. 

Alarm bells! 

Expect a breakup or divorce anytime sooner! You have become a commodity now.

Congrats! More stress and enjoy another feather of failure in your cap! 

The weight shifted once again, gently but firmly.

Confidence eroded slowly. Not through one event, but through many.

“You are not good enough.”

“You are not trying hard enough.”

“You are not suitable.”

These messages, repeated in different forms, began to settle deep within.

Even in spaces where such voices were absent, their echoes remained.

These young adults became bald and grey haired looking old. They began taking medications for high BP and lipids. They followed their parents footsteps visiting astrologers and places of worship. Some started finding solace in ethyl alcohol among other unhealthy things. Only a handful got unconditional support from their partners and family. 

Some decided to 'change' but only a few became successful. 

The vast majority were traumatized beyond repair by the very same persons who were supposed to mentor, guide and support.

“I am not sure I can do this,” someone would say, even when they were capable.

“Why not?”

“I just… feel like I will fail.”

Fear outlived its source.

Back in the institution, new students stood where others once stood. They noticed the same silence. The same shifts in the atmosphere.

“Is it always like this?” one asked.

Another hesitated before answering.

“You will get used to it.”

That sentence carried both warning and resignation.

Some did get used to it. 

Others never did. 

They were labelled as 'failures'. 

No one cared for them except their parents. All their 'friends' and 'acquaintances' disappeared in no time. They became 'insignificant' in society.

Among the quiet resistance, small acts of kindness persisted. Notes shared. Encouragement whispered. Help offered without expectation. Low profile mentee-mentor process aiming for professional and personal growth initiated by the kind ones, just initiated! 

“You did well,” someone would say softly after a harsh critique.

“It did not feel like it.”

“It was.”

Those moments mattered. Really mattered!

They reminded students that the system was not the entirety of their experience.

Yet, they were not enough to change the structure. Those voices were powerless. But it highlighted the fact that not all are bad. 

Sadly, the power lies with those who manipulate the system. 

They remain unaccountable.

The imbalance remained.

Power without accountability creates patterns. Patterns, when repeated, become culture.

And culture shapes people.

In the end, the institution was more than its buildings or its curriculum. It was the sum of its interactions. Its silences. Its choices.

It taught more than subjects. It taught behavior.

Some lessons were explicit. 

Many were not.

“What did you learn?” someone once asked a graduate.

There was a pause before the answer.

“I learned how to survive.”

That was not the intended outcome. But it was the real one.

Survival, in this context, meant compromise. It meant silence. It meant adaptation.

It also meant carrying forward a version of the system, whether consciously or not.

And what did humans gain out of this cobweb? Robotic mental construct? Veiled Sadism? Mental imbalance? 

The question that lingered was simple, yet difficult.

If a place designed to educate ends up shaping fear more than curiosity, control more than creativity, and silence more than expression, what does that say about its purpose?

And more importantly, what does it do to those who pass through it?

The answers were not easy. 

They rarely are.

But they existed, in quiet reflections, in late night conversations, in moments of clarity that came unannounced.

“I do not want to become this,” someone said once, staring at their reflection.

That awareness was a beginning.

Not a solution. 

Not a transformation.

But a beginning!

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊

Iconoclasm in Effigy: Banksy’s Subversive Sculpture of Veiled Allegiance

The purported new sculptural intervention attributed to Bansky emerges as a mordant yet meticulously calibrated provocation, distilling contemporary anxieties into a form that is at once austere and theatrically subversive. Its visual economy - deceptively minimal - belies an intricate semiotic architecture, wherein each element functions as a loaded signifier within a broader critique of surveillance culture and civic passivity. The composition appears almost reticent at first glance, yet this restraint is precisely what amplifies its rhetorical potency; absence, here, is as eloquent as presence.

The central figure, rendered with an almost ascetic sparseness, evokes a fragile corporeality that stands in stark contraposition to the looming apparatus above it. This juxtaposition is neither incidental nor merely aesthetic; it orchestrates a dialectic between innocence and omnipresent scrutiny, implicating the viewer within the very regime it seeks to indict. The elevated mechanical gaze - cold, impersonal, and unblinking - exerts a hegemonic dominance over the scene, transforming public space into a panoptic theatre where autonomy is subtly but inexorably eroded.

This Bansky sculpture manifests a scathing allegory of occluded identity, wherein the visage shrouded by the flag signifies a coerced subsumption of individuality beneath performative patriotism. The precarious stance - one foot displaced beyond the pedestal - evokes a disquieting sense of socio-political disequilibrium, intimating the fragility of such constructed nationalistic postures. Together, these elements coalesce into a trenchant critique of ideological myopia, exposing the inherent instability that festers beneath ostentatious displays of allegiance.

Materially, the sculpture appears to appropriate the lexicon of urban decay - abrasive textures, fissured surfaces, and a patina suggestive of entropy - to underscore a sense of societal disintegration. The base, fractured and uneven, operates as a metaphorical substratum, intimating that the foundations of civic trust and collective freedom are themselves compromised. Such textural intentionality imbues the work with a tactile immediacy, compelling the observer to confront not merely an idea, but a palpable condition of decline.

Equally compelling is the symbolic intervention of the secondary motif - an object ostensibly delicate yet rendered in a form that subverts its conventional associations. Its distorted configuration transforms it from an emblem of buoyancy into one of latent menace, thereby enacting a visual paradox that destabilizes interpretive certainties. This ambiguity is quintessentially characteristic of the artist’s oeuvre, wherein meaning is never didactic but perpetually contingent, oscillating between irony and indictment.

The sculpture’s emplacement within the urban milieu further augments its discursive resonance. Rather than existing as an isolated artefact, it insinuates itself into the quotidian rhythms of the city, confronting passersby with an unanticipated moment of disquiet. This strategic insertion disrupts the anaesthetized flow of metropolitan life, compelling a reconsideration of the ostensibly benign infrastructures that govern it. In this sense, the work transcends its materiality, functioning as a catalytic event rather than a static object.

Ultimately, the sculpture exemplifies a sophisticated synthesis of conceptual acuity and visual restraint. It eschews overt grandiosity in favour of a more insidious, lingering impact - one that operates on the psyche long after the initial encounter. Through its incisive symbolism and contextual intelligence, it reaffirms the enduring capacity of public art to interrogate power structures and provoke critical introspection, rendering it not merely an artwork, but a resonant socio-political commentary of considerable profundity.

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊

The Weight of You: How Responsibility Is Placed on the Individual While Power Stands Apart

The day begins quietly, almost as if nothing has yet made a claim on it, and in that brief stretch of stillness there is a sense that things could unfold differently. But before long, the familiar voice returns, not spoken aloud, not coming from any one place, yet present all the same. You are responsible. It settles in gently, like something that belongs, something that has always been there.

A person sits at the edge of a bed, staring at their hands as if answers might be written there. “I need to fix this,” they say softly. The words are not questioned. They are accepted as fact, as duty. Whatever is wrong must be corrected from within. Whatever is broken must be repaired by the one who feels it.

Outside, the world moves with confidence. Systems continue, conversations unfold, decisions are made in rooms far removed from this quiet space. Somewhere else, a voice speaks with clarity and authority, steady and composed.

“There are issues affecting people,” the voice declares. “We are aware of the situation.”

The tone carries assurance, not doubt. There is no hesitation, no pause to examine personal fault. The problem exists, yes, but it is positioned outward, something to be addressed, managed, responded to. The speaker stands aligned with the task, not burdened by it.

Back in the small room, the person leans forward, elbows on knees. “Why does it always come back to me?” they ask, though no one is there to answer.

Later that day, they sit across from someone trained to listen, someone whose role is to guide, to help untangle the knots that have formed over time.

“I feel like everything is my fault,” the person begins.

“What makes you feel that way?” comes the calm reply.

The question is gentle, but it directs the focus inward again. It does not challenge the assumption. It explores it.

“I do not know,” they say. “Maybe I am not doing enough. Maybe I am not thinking the right way.”

“What do you mean by the right way?” the listener asks.

The conversation circles around thoughts, beliefs, patterns. It moves deeper into the self, examining reactions, reframing perceptions. The individual becomes the center of inquiry, the source of both problem and solution.

“You have to understand your role in this,” the listener says carefully.

“My role,” the person repeats.

“Yes,” comes the response. “What are you contributing to the situation?”

The question lands with weight. It is not accusatory, yet it carries an implication. There is something within that must be identified, corrected, improved.

“So it is me,” the person says, almost to themselves.

“It is about understanding yourself,” the listener clarifies.

But the distinction is subtle, and the effect remains. The lens narrows. Everything bends back toward the individual.

Walking out of that room, the person feels a familiar mixture of clarity and pressure. There is insight, yes, but also a reinforced sense of responsibility. “I need to do better,” they think. “I need to change.”

On a different stage, another conversation unfolds, one that reaches far more people at once. A figure stands before a gathering, speaking with practiced ease.

“There is an injustice happening,” the voice says. “We are taking steps to address it.”

The words are firm, decisive. The problem is acknowledged openly, even emphatically. Yet there is no trace of personal blame in the tone. No inward turning. No questioning of self.

Someone listening raises a voice. “Are you responsible for this?”

There is a brief pause, but it is not uncertainty. It is calculation.

“This is a complex issue,” the speaker replies. “It involves many factors beyond any one individual.”

The answer shifts the frame outward, dispersing responsibility across a wide and undefined space. The speaker remains composed, aligned with action, not burdened by guilt.

This contrast does not go unnoticed, even if it is rarely articulated fully. In one space, the individual is guided inward, asked to examine, adjust, take ownership. In another, those with authority stand outward, addressing problems without absorbing them.

In a quiet conversation between friends, this difference begins to surface.

“I went to talk about what I am going through,” one person says. “And everything came back to me. My thoughts, my choices, my reactions.”

“And did that help?” the other asks.

“In some ways,” comes the reply. “But it also made me feel like I am the problem.”

The friend considers this. “Do you think you are?”

“I do not know,” they admit. “But it feels like I am supposed to be.”

There is a silence, one that carries more than words.

“Meanwhile,” the first person continues, “you hear people in power talk about issues like they are separate from them. Like they are observers, not participants.”

“They never seem to blame themselves,” the friend says.

“Exactly,” comes the response. “They adapt, they adjust, they align. They move forward without that weight.”

“And you feel like you cannot do that,” the friend suggests.

“I feel like I am not allowed to,” they say. “Like I have to carry it, analyze it, fix it.”

The difference becomes clearer in that moment. It is not just about what is said, but about how responsibility is framed. For one, it is internalized. For the other, it is externalized.

In another session, the pattern repeats, subtle but consistent.

“I keep thinking I should be able to handle this,” the person says.

“What does handling it mean to you?” the listener asks.

“It means not feeling this way,” they reply. “It means being in control.”

“And what can you do to move toward that?” comes the next question.

Again, the focus returns to action within the self. Techniques are discussed, strategies suggested. The individual is equipped with tools, yet the underlying message remains unchanged. The solution lies within.

“But what if the situation itself is the problem?” the person asks, hesitating slightly.

“We can only work with what is within your control,” the listener responds.

The statement is logical, practical. Yet it also draws a boundary, one that excludes larger forces from the immediate conversation. What lies beyond control is acknowledged but not addressed.

Walking out again, the person feels the familiar echo. You you you. It repeats, not as a harsh command, but as a quiet insistence.

At the same time, in public discourse, the language continues to flow outward.

“There are systemic challenges,” a voice announces. “We are committed to finding solutions.”

“Why did this happen in the first place?” someone asks.

“It is the result of many interconnected factors,” comes the reply.

Again, responsibility is spread thin, diluted. The speaker remains steady, unaffected at a personal level.

In a late evening reflection, the person sits alone, turning these contrasts over in their mind.

“They never seem to question themselves,” they say quietly.

“Who?” comes a voice from across the room.

“Those who speak about the problems,” they explain. “They talk about everything that is wrong, but they do not seem to carry it the way I do.”

“What do you mean?” the other asks.

“They address it,” comes the reply. “They do not absorb it.”

“And you feel like you are absorbing everything,” the other suggests.

“Yes,” they say. “Every failure, every difficulty, every feeling. It all comes back to me.”

The room grows still for a moment.

“Do you think that is fair?” the other asks.

The question lingers, unfamiliar.

“I never thought about it that way,” they admit.

In that pause, something shifts slightly. Not a complete change, but a crack in the certainty of what has been accepted.

The idea that individuals must carry full responsibility begins to feel less absolute. It does not disappear, but it is questioned.

“Maybe I am responsible for some things,” they say slowly. “But not everything.”

The statement feels tentative, as if testing new ground.

“And maybe those who speak about problems are responsible for some of it too,” the other adds.

There is a quiet recognition in that thought, one that brings balance to a previously uneven equation.

“I have been taught to look at myself for every answer,” the person says.

“And what have you found?” comes the reply.

“Sometimes answers,” they say. “But also a lot of blame.”

The word sits heavily in the air.

“Blame can be useful,” the other says carefully. “But only when it is accurate.”

“And when it is not?” the person asks.

“It becomes a burden,” comes the answer.

The simplicity of it is striking.

As the night deepens, the reflections continue, weaving together experiences from different spaces. The quiet room of introspection. The structured environment of guided conversation. The public stage of authority. Each one carries its own narrative, its own way of assigning responsibility.

“I still want to improve myself,” the person says.

“And you can,” the other replies.

“But I do not want to believe that everything is my fault,” they add.

“That is a different thing,” comes the response. “Improvement does not require total blame.”

The distinction settles gently, offering a different way to hold responsibility.

In the distance, another voice speaks again to a larger audience, steady and composed.

“We are addressing the situation,” it says.

“And what about your role in it?” someone asks, this time more clearly.

The answer comes as before, measured and careful, shifting focus outward.

Back in the quiet room, the person leans back, looking at the ceiling.

“I think I see it now,” they say.

“What do you see?” the other asks.

“That I have been carrying more than I should,” they reply. “And others have been carrying less than they could.”

The balance feels uneven, but naming it brings a sense of clarity.

“And what will you do with that?” comes the final question.

“I will still take responsibility for my life,” they say. “But I will stop taking responsibility for everything.”

The words are simple, yet they hold a quiet strength.

In that moment, the narrative shifts, just enough to make space for something more honest. Not a rejection of personal effort, not a denial of agency, but a recognition that responsibility is not meant to be held by one alone.

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊

Beneath the Facade: Unraveling the Hidden Layers of Deceit People Carry in a World That Rewards Appearances

The first thing you notice is not the lie itself but the smoothness with which it arrives. It comes wrapped in a tone that feels practiced, almost tender, as if it has been rehearsed in the quiet spaces between thoughts. People do not often begin with grand deception. They begin with small adjustments, tiny edits to reality, a gentle shifting of truth so it sits more comfortably in the moment. It is almost invisible at first, like a ripple on still water that disappears before you can decide whether it was ever there.

A person sits across from another, smiling in a way that seems sincere. Their eyes hold steady, their voice calm. “I am fine,” they say, even though something inside them is unraveling thread by thread. The words float between them, accepted without question. The listener nods, perhaps relieved, perhaps unwilling to dig deeper. And just like that, the first layer settles into place. It is not malicious. It is not even unusual. It is simply easier.

Deceit today rarely announces itself as something dark or dangerous. It disguises itself as convenience, as politeness, as survival. People learn early that truth can complicate things. Truth demands explanation, invites judgment, and sometimes creates distance. So they build small walls, not to deceive others in a grand sense, but to protect fragile pieces of themselves. Over time, those walls do not stay small. They grow, brick by brick, until even the person who built them forgets what lies on the other side.

“Why did you not tell me earlier?” someone asks, their voice carrying a mixture of confusion and hurt.

“I did not think it mattered,” comes the reply, soft and careful.

But it did matter. It always matters. The problem is that by the time the truth surfaces, it is no longer just about the original fact. It is about the accumulation of silence, the layering of half truths, the quiet decisions made at each step to withhold just a little more. Each omission adds weight, until the truth feels too heavy to carry all at once.

Modern life encourages this layering in subtle ways. There is an unspoken expectation to present a curated version of oneself, one that is polished and consistent. People learn to filter their experiences, to share only what aligns with the image they wish to maintain. Over time, the gap between who they are and who they appear to be begins to widen. It becomes a careful balancing act, a constant negotiation between authenticity and acceptance.

“I posted that I was happy,” someone confesses late at night, their voice barely above a whisper. “But I was not.”

“Then why post it?” the other person asks.

There is a pause, long enough to hold all the unspoken reasons.

“Because everyone else seems to be,” comes the answer.

This is where deceit takes on a collective dimension. It is no longer just individual choices but a shared illusion. People participate in it knowingly and unknowingly, reinforcing each other’s narratives. The result is a world where appearances often feel more real than reality itself. It becomes difficult to tell where honesty ends and performance begins.

Yet beneath all these layers, there is a persistent discomfort. A sense that something is not quite aligned. It shows up in quiet moments, in the spaces where distractions fade and thoughts become louder. People feel it but struggle to name it. They might call it stress, or confusion, or simply the feeling of being lost. But often, it is the weight of maintaining too many versions of the truth.

“I do not even know what I actually feel anymore,” someone admits, their voice tinged with frustration.

“What do you mean?” comes the response.

“I mean I have said so many different things to so many different people that I cannot tell which one is real.”

This is the hidden cost of layered deceit. It does not just affect relationships with others. It erodes the relationship one has with oneself. When truth becomes flexible, identity becomes unstable. People begin to question their own perceptions, their own memories, their own emotions. The line between genuine experience and constructed narrative blurs.

It is important to understand that not all deceit is intentional. Much of it is learned behavior, shaped by environment and experience. People observe what is rewarded and what is punished. They adapt accordingly. If honesty leads to conflict or rejection, they learn to soften it, to reshape it into something more acceptable. Over time, this adaptation becomes instinctive.

“Just say what they want to hear,” someone advises casually, as if it is the most natural thing in the world.

“But that is not how I feel,” comes the hesitant reply.

“It does not matter,” the first voice insists. “It makes things easier.”

And so the pattern continues. Ease becomes the guiding principle, even if it comes at the cost of authenticity. The immediate benefit outweighs the long term consequence. After all, the consequences are not always immediate. They accumulate slowly, almost imperceptibly, until one day they become impossible to ignore.

Relationships built on layered deceit often feel stable on the surface. There are no dramatic confrontations, no obvious conflicts. Everything appears to function smoothly. But beneath that surface, there is a lack of depth, a sense that something essential is missing. Conversations remain shallow, avoiding the areas where truth might disrupt the delicate balance.

“Do you trust me?” one person asks, searching the other’s face for reassurance.

“Of course,” comes the quick response.

But trust in such situations is often based on assumption rather than understanding. It is fragile, easily shaken by the smallest revelation. When a layer of deceit is finally exposed, it does not just reveal a single truth. It exposes the entire structure, forcing both people to confront the extent of what has been hidden.

“I did not know you at all,” someone says, their voice breaking under the weight of realization.

“I was afraid you would not accept me,” comes the reply, equally fragile.

This fear lies at the core of much deceit. The fear of being seen fully, of being judged, of being rejected. It is a powerful force, capable of shaping behavior in profound ways. People would rather present a controlled version of themselves than risk the vulnerability of complete honesty. It feels safer, even if it is ultimately isolating.

There is also a certain skill involved in maintaining these layers. It requires attention to detail, consistency, and the ability to adapt quickly when circumstances change. People become adept at managing their narratives, adjusting them as needed to fit different contexts. It is almost like performing multiple roles, each with its own script and expectations.

“Remember what you told them,” someone reminds themselves internally. “Do not contradict it.”

This constant monitoring can be exhausting, even if it becomes second nature over time. It requires mental energy, emotional restraint, and a willingness to suppress contradictions. The more layers there are, the more complex the system becomes. Eventually, it reaches a point where maintaining it feels like a full time effort.

Despite all this, there are moments when the layers slip. Small cracks appear, revealing glimpses of the underlying truth. It might be in a sudden change of tone, an inconsistency in a story, or an emotional reaction that does not align with the presented narrative. These moments are often dismissed or overlooked, but they carry significance.

“Wait, that is not what you said before,” someone points out gently.

“Oh, I must have misspoken,” comes the quick correction.

And the layer is patched, the crack sealed, at least temporarily. But each crack leaves a trace, a subtle reminder that the structure is not as solid as it appears.

The question then becomes why this pattern persists, even when its drawbacks are evident. Part of the answer lies in its normalization. When deceit becomes common, it loses its stigma. It is no longer seen as something exceptional but as a routine part of interaction. People expect a certain level of inauthenticity and adjust their expectations accordingly.

“I know they are not telling me everything,” someone admits casually. “But that is just how things are.”

This acceptance creates a feedback loop. The more people expect deceit, the more they engage in it. It becomes a shared understanding, an unspoken agreement to maintain appearances. Breaking this pattern requires not just individual effort but a shift in collective mindset, which is far more challenging.

There are, however, instances where people choose to step away from these layers. It is not an easy decision. It involves risk, vulnerability, and a willingness to face uncertainty. But it also offers the possibility of genuine connection, of being seen and understood without filters.

“I am tired of pretending,” someone says, their voice steady despite the underlying tension.

“What do you mean?” the other person asks, sensing a shift.

“I mean I want to be honest, even if it makes things complicated.”

There is a pause, filled with anticipation and apprehension.

“Then be honest,” comes the response, cautious but open.

This moment marks a turning point. It is where the possibility of dismantling layers begins. It does not happen all at once. It is a gradual process, requiring patience and mutual effort. Each layer removed reveals another beneath it, sometimes more difficult to confront than the last.

Honesty in such a context is not just about sharing facts. It is about acknowledging emotions, admitting uncertainties, and accepting imperfections. It requires a level of self awareness that is often obscured by layers of deceit. People must reconnect with their own truth before they can share it with others.

“I am not as confident as I seem,” someone admits, their voice carrying a mix of relief and vulnerability.

“I never expected you to be perfect,” comes the gentle reply.

These exchanges may seem simple, but they carry profound significance. They challenge the assumption that acceptance is conditional, that one must present a flawless version of oneself to be valued. In doing so, they create space for authenticity to emerge.

Of course, not all attempts at honesty are met with understanding. There are times when truth does lead to conflict, when it disrupts relationships or exposes incompatibilities. This is one of the reasons people resort to deceit in the first place. The risk is real, and the outcomes are not always favorable.

“I wish you had not told me,” someone says, struggling to process what they have heard.

“But you deserved to know,” comes the quiet response.

These moments are difficult, but they are also clarifying. They reveal the true nature of relationships, stripping away illusions and forcing a confrontation with reality. While this can be painful, it also provides an opportunity for growth and realignment.

In the end, the layers of deceit people carry are both a reflection of their fears and a response to their environment. They are not inherently malicious, but they are limiting. They create distance where there could be closeness, confusion where there could be clarity. Recognizing these layers is the first step toward addressing them.

The challenge lies in finding a balance, in navigating the complexities of human interaction without losing sight of authenticity. It is not about eliminating all forms of deceit, which may not be entirely possible, but about becoming more conscious of it. About questioning when and why it occurs, and whether it truly serves a purpose.

“I want to understand you,” someone says sincerely, looking beyond the surface.

“Then you have to be willing to see all of me,” comes the reply.

That is where the real work begins, in the willingness to see and be seen without the protective layers. It is uncomfortable, uncertain, and at times overwhelming. But it is also where genuine connection resides, waiting beneath the carefully constructed facades, ready to emerge when given the chance.

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊

The Illusion of Knowing Everything - the Know All

The tea stall stood at the corner where the road bent just enough to slow people down and make them notice things they would otherwise ignore. It was a place where conversations floated like steam, curling and dissolving into the morning air. Anyone who paused there long enough would hear opinions about everything from weather to world affairs, spoken with a certainty that felt almost contagious.

On one such morning, a man leaned against the wooden counter, stirring his tea long after the sugar had dissolved. He spoke loudly enough for others to hear, though he pretended he was addressing only the shopkeeper.

“The problem with the world,” he said, “is that people do not understand how things really work.”

The shopkeeper smiled faintly. He had heard this line many times, from many mouths. “And how do things really work?” he asked, pouring another cup.

The man lifted his chin slightly, as though preparing to deliver something profound. “Everything is connected. Economy, health, education, even the way people talk. If you understand one thing deeply, you understand all things.”

A few heads turned. A student sitting on a bench nearby leaned forward, intrigued. “So you mean if someone studies one subject, they can speak about everything else too?”

“Exactly,” the man replied without hesitation. “Knowledge is not separate. It is one big system. Those who truly understand it can speak on any matter.”

The student nodded slowly, though something in his eyes suggested doubt. “But what about details? Different fields have different complexities.”

The man waved his hand dismissively. “Details are distractions. True intelligence sees patterns, not details.”

A silence followed, brief but noticeable. Then another voice entered, softer, almost hesitant. “But without details, how can one be sure?”

The man turned, slightly annoyed. “Experience,” he said. “Observation. Thinking. That is enough.”

The conversation drifted, as conversations often do, but the impression lingered. The certainty, the confidence, the ease with which complex subjects were reduced to simple statements. It felt convincing, even comforting. Yet something about it seemed fragile, like a structure built quickly without testing its strength.

As the day unfolded, the same pattern repeated in different places. At a bus stop, a group gathered around a person explaining why the traffic system failed. “It is simple,” he said. “The authorities do not think logically. If they followed a basic plan, everything would be smooth.”

A passerby asked, “What kind of plan?”

The response came instantly. “A systematic one. Timed signals, better roads, stricter rules. Anyone with common sense can see that.”

“Have you studied traffic systems?” the passerby asked.

The man smiled, almost amused. “You do not need to study everything formally. Some things are obvious.”

Later, in a crowded bus, another conversation unfolded. A discussion about health turned into a lecture delivered by someone who claimed to understand the human body completely. “Doctors make it complicated,” he said. “The body heals itself. All you need is the right food and mindset.”

A woman sitting beside him asked quietly, “What about serious illnesses?”

“They are caused by imbalance,” he replied. “Fix the imbalance, and the illness disappears.”

“And how does one fix it?” she pressed.

He leaned back, confident. “That depends. But I can tell you, most treatments are unnecessary.”

The woman looked out of the window, her expression unreadable. The bus rattled on, carrying not just passengers but also fragments of certainty that seemed to fill every available space.

In offices, in markets, in homes, the same voices echoed. People spoke about politics as though they had sat in the highest councils. They spoke about science as though they had conducted every experiment themselves. They spoke about art, philosophy, relationships, technology, each subject approached with equal confidence, equal authority.

At a small gathering one evening, the topic shifted rapidly from one subject to another. A person who had been discussing literature suddenly began explaining economic policies.

“It is all about distribution,” he said. “If resources are allocated properly, there will be no inequality.”

Someone asked, “What does proper allocation mean in practice?”

He paused for a moment, then answered, “It means fairness.”

“And how is fairness defined?” another voice asked.

He frowned slightly, as if the question itself was unnecessary. “Fairness is obvious. Everyone knows what it is.”

A quiet laugh came from the corner. “If everyone knows, why do people disagree so much?”

The speaker hesitated, then recovered. “Because they are misinformed.”

The room fell into a thoughtful silence. It was not disagreement that filled the space, but something more subtle. A recognition, perhaps, that certainty often travels faster than understanding.

There was something almost theatrical about these moments. The way people positioned themselves as authorities, the way they spoke without pause, the way they brushed aside questions that required deeper thought. It was not always arrogance. Sometimes it was habit. Sometimes it was the desire to belong, to be seen as capable, informed, relevant.

One evening, two friends sat by a quiet roadside, watching the slow movement of vehicles under dim lights.

“Why do people do that?” one asked.

“Do what?” the other replied.

“Speak as if they know everything.”

The second friend thought for a while. “Maybe because not knowing feels uncomfortable.”

The first nodded. “So they fill the gaps with confidence.”

“Yes,” came the reply. “Confidence is easier to display than curiosity.”

They sat in silence for a moment, letting the thought settle.

“But curiosity is more honest,” the first said.

“It is,” the other agreed. “But it also exposes limits.”

“And people do not like showing limits.”

“No,” the second said. “They prefer to appear complete.”

A gentle breeze moved through the trees, carrying with it the distant sound of conversation. It seemed endless, this flow of opinions and explanations, each one presented as though it were the final word.

At a classroom the next day, a teacher asked a simple question. “What does it mean to understand something?”

Hands went up quickly. Answers came with confidence.

“It means knowing how it works.”

“It means being able to explain it.”

“It means having all the information.”

The teacher listened patiently, then asked, “Does understanding include knowing what you do not know?”

The room grew quiet.

A student spoke slowly. “Maybe it does.”

The teacher smiled. “And how often do we admit that?”

No one answered.

Outside, the world continued as it always had. Conversations unfolded, opinions were shared, conclusions were drawn. The rhythm did not change. But somewhere within it, there were moments of pause. Moments where certainty cracked slightly, allowing a glimpse of something else.

At a small shop, a person who had once spoken confidently about everything now listened more than he spoke. When asked a question, he sometimes said, “I am not sure.” At first, it felt strange, almost like a loss. But over time, it began to feel different.

One day, someone asked him, “You used to have answers for everything. What changed?”

He smiled, not with superiority, but with something quieter. “I realized that answers are easy. Understanding is not.”

“And now?”

“Now I try to understand before I speak.”

“Does that make conversations harder?”

“Sometimes,” he admitted. “But it also makes them more real.”

The other person nodded thoughtfully. “And what about when you do not understand?”

“Then I ask,” he said simply.

There was no dramatic shift in the world, no sudden transformation. People still spoke with certainty. Opinions still flowed freely. The know all presence remained, woven into the fabric of everyday life.

But in small, almost invisible ways, something softened. A question asked here, a pause taken there, a moment of honesty that replaced a quick answer. These were not grand changes, but they mattered.

Because beneath the surface of confident voices, there was always something else waiting. A quieter layer, less certain but more genuine. A space where knowledge was not performed, but explored.

And in that space, conversations felt different. They were slower, sometimes uncertain, often incomplete. But they carried a weight that certainty alone could never provide.

At the tea stall, the same man returned one morning. He stirred his tea again, though this time he did not speak immediately. When he did, his voice was softer.

“The problem with the world,” he began, then paused.

The shopkeeper looked at him, curious.

He smiled slightly. “Actually, I am not sure what the problem is.”

The shopkeeper raised an eyebrow. “That is new.”

“Yes,” the man said. “I am trying something different.”

“What is that?”

“Thinking before concluding.”

The shopkeeper laughed gently. “That might take longer.”

“It does,” the man admitted. “But it feels more honest.”

A few people nearby listened, surprised but interested.

“So what do you think now?” someone asked.

The man looked around, as if searching for the right words. “I think we all know some things,” he said slowly. “And we all do not know many things. Pretending otherwise does not help.”

The student from before spoke up. “Then what should we do?”

The man considered the question. “Maybe we should listen more. Ask more. And accept that not knowing is part of learning.”

The student nodded, this time without doubt.

The conversation continued, but its tone had shifted. There was still discussion, still opinions, but also something else. A willingness to explore rather than declare.

And in that small corner of the world, the know all voice grew quieter, not because it was silenced, but because it no longer needed to dominate.

The tea stall remained, the road still bent in the same way, and people still gathered. But if one listened carefully, beneath the confident statements and quick conclusions, there was a different sound emerging.

The sound of thought.

The sound of questions.

The sound of people slowly learning that knowing everything was never the goal, and perhaps never even possible.

And in that realization, there was something unexpectedly freeing.

Please check out this DISCLAIMER before accessing this post

Liked this post? Well..., I have one more interesting blog, click here to check out the latest updates there too 😊